Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay on Business Relocation: Coherence Challenges
Sample Answer with Feedback

It is believed that large business and industries along with their employees from cities to rural areas could solve the issues of traffic congestion and housing in famous cities. This essay will discuss the both views on agreement and disagreement. Overall, the urban areas are currently facing traffic jams, housings, pollution etc. due to increasing population in search of job and business purposes.

To agree with the statement, transferring the people from cities to country side help in reducing the problems created by huge number vehicles and the population. Big business and industries are installed where the flow of population is higher. People use private vehicles to go for work which increases traffic problems and large number of individuals create chaos to find shelters leading unamanaged urbanization. For instance, Kathmandu city is facing these problems since few decades which creates tension among the public and government to tackle the problems.

On the other hand, shifting business and industries to other location could create huge problem. It puts stress on economy and citizens face problem to cope with new arrangement as they are used to with previous work place. Peole have to leave their home and family for the job. Also the main point to be noticed is they cannot catch the way of rural living culture which might bring physical and mental challenges for them. For example, people in urban areas might have settled there and they are familiar with the surrounding they live which they would find it stressful to start again in place.

In the conclusion, replacing industries and business is a good idea to solve the traffic and housing issues in city areas is a good idea to some extent.

    Traffic congestion and housing shortages are major challenges for many cities today. Some propose moving large businesses, industries, and their workers to rural areas as a solution. However, I believe this approach is neither feasible nor effective. A more sustainable alternative would be to improve urban infrastructure and transportation systems rather than displacing economic hubs.

    To begin with, relocating businesses and industries would require extensive resources, planning, and coordination. According to the World Bank, relocating a firm demands careful management and significant resources, often disrupting productivity, profitability, and overall competitiveness, affecting both firms and workers. Additionally, uprooting employees from established urban communities could negatively impact their well-being and quality of life, making relocation an undesirable option for many. Given the financial and logistical burdens, large-scale relocation is unlikely to gain support from businesses or governments.

    Moreover, this strategy fails to address the root causes of traffic congestion and housing shortages. These issues stem from rapid urbanization, population growth, and inadequate infrastructure in cities. Moving some firms and workers would not resolve these fundamental problems but instead shift them elsewhere. Instead of relocating businesses, cities should focus on expanding public transportation and enforcing zoning regulations to create more efficient living spaces. Additionally, relocating businesses to rural areas could introduce new challenges, such as environmental degradation, social disruption, and economic disparities.

    In conclusion, addressing traffic congestion and housing shortages requires comprehensive urban planning and investment in infrastructure rather than relocating businesses and workers to rural areas. Thus, I think that developing smart cities with sustainable solutions can improve urban conditions while minimizing negative impacts on rural areas. By focusing on sustainable development and effective governance, cities can create long-term solutions that enhance livability while fostering balanced growth between urban and rural regions.