IELTS Writing Task 2 Question
Agree/ Disagree (Opinion) Β· Urban Planning Β· 40 min
Relocating big businesses and industries and their workers from urban areas to rural areas could be a good solution for the issues of traffic congestion and housing in major cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Write at least 250 words.
ο»Ώο»Ώ
Score Breakdown
IELTS Writing Band Scores (1β9)
Summary: The essay meets the minimum word count (263 words) and addresses the prompt by agreeing with the relocation of businesses to rural areas. However, the arguments are simplistic and lack depth, with no counterarguments or nuanced discussion. Significant spelling and grammatical errors, limited vocabulary range, and weak cohesion reduce the overall effectiveness. The essay is clear but underdeveloped, resulting in a Band 5.5 overall.
Now write your own β and see how your verdict holds up.
Submit your Urban Planning essay and receive AI scores across Task Response, Coherence, Lexical Resource, and Grammar β plus a Band 9 model answer for your exact question.
It is always suggested that moving large corporations and industries from heavy populated mertopolitans to countryside is a better alternative to reduce traffic congestion and the housing issues. I completely agree with this solution since it promotes regional development and reduces the city density.
When large scale industries are relocated in rural locations, it helps to slow down traffic congestion as well as housing problems. As people move to regional areas, more space is created and house rentals are reduced, which is importantly benificail for the residents. Moreover, traffic ques are no longer a major barrier in daily transportation, because of the low crowd who are remaining in major cities. The divastating rides with traffic are reduced with less vehicles.
In terms of job market, relocating large corporations in rural regions supply a considerable career oppotunities for the population living there. As contryside provides large spaces for buildings, apartments and accomodations which are essential for vast investments, the working areas can be spaciously planned, which attract more staff to work leisurely.
Not only leisure working environment, but the lower crowded roads also helps the mental relaxation of the workers in the industries. The pressure of driving in a traffic congestion in a major city is not experienced in countyside. instead, the rides in less populated roads supports the tranquility of life after a hectic workload of the working environment.
To sum up, when the given factors are considered, I firmly believe that relocating large businesses and industries with their workers to rural lands is really benifitial in both sides: traffic congestion and housing.
AI Feedback Report Details
Spelling Β· Grammar Β· Vocabulary Β· Criteria Analysis
Spelling Mistakes
9 errors| Misspelled Word | Corrected Word |
|---|---|
| mertopolitans | metropolitans |
| benificail | beneficial |
| ques | queues |
| divastating | devastating |
| contryside | countryside |
| accomodations | accommodations |
| oppotunities | opportunities |
| countyside | countryside |
| benifitial | beneficial |
Grammatical Mistakes
8 errors| Mistake | Correction | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| heavy populated | heavily populated | Adverb needed before adjective 'populated' |
| to countryside | to the countryside | Missing definite article 'the' |
| the housing issues | housing issues | Unnecessary definite article in general reference |
| low crowd who are remaining | fewer people who remain | 'Crowd' is singular; 'fewer people' is countable; 'are remaining' should be present tense 'remain' |
| less vehicles | fewer vehicles | 'Vehicles' is countable, so use 'fewer' instead of 'less' |
| supply a considerable career oppotunities | supplies considerable career opportunities | Subject-verb agreement: 'relocating' is singular, so 'supplies'; also remove 'a' before plural 'opportunities' |
| Not only leisure working environment, but the lower crowded roads also helps | Not only a leisure working environment, but also the less crowded roads help | Missing article 'a'; 'lower crowded' should be 'less crowded'; subject 'roads' plural, so 'help' not 'helps'; also 'also' misplaced |
| in both sides | on both sides | Preposition 'in' is incorrect; use 'on' with 'sides' |
Vocabulary Improvements
8 suggestions| Original Word/Phrase | Improved Word/Phrase | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| heavy populated | densely populated | 'Heavily populated' is acceptable but 'densely populated' is more precise and academic |
| importantly beneficial | very beneficial | 'Importantly' is not typically used as an intensifier; 'very' or 'highly' is more appropriate |
| low crowd | small population | 'Crowd' is informal and implies a group of people; 'population' is more formal and accurate in context |
| divastating rides | frustrating commutes | 'Devastating' is too strong; 'frustrating' is more appropriate, and 'rides' should be 'commutes' for work travel |
| supply ... opportunities | provide ... opportunities | 'Supply' is used for goods; 'provide' is the correct collocation with 'opportunities' |
| work leisurely | work in a relaxed environment | 'Leisurely' as an adverb is rare; rephrase to convey the intended meaning clearly |
| lower crowded roads | less congested roads | 'Lower crowded' is awkward; 'less congested' is the standard phrase for traffic |
| helps the mental relaxation | promotes mental relaxation | 'Helps' is vague; 'promotes' is more precise and academic |
Ready to practise? Get instant AI feedback on your verdict.
Submit your Urban Planning essay and receive AI scores across all four IELTS criteria β with specific feedback on whether your solutions are specific, realistic, and matched to your problems.
Detailed Criteria Feedback
AI-powered analysis for each scoring criterion