Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay on Rural Relocation: Coherence Issues
Sample Answer with Feedback

I would not agree to this relocation for it affects various aspect of the economy and not just the business that moves from urban to rural areas.

The level of agreement I would rate in this act of urban planning is 5/10. Relocating big businesses and industries and so as the workers to rural areas would just result for the traffic congestions and travel in housing happen to the relocation sites. In addition, such move is a big step for businesses and these industries, such step requires a study for probable effect in the business and the community surrounding the rural area.

Moreover, the relocation can affect the environment for it requires construction and this deals with a lot of quarrying of mountains, probable contamination of water supply especially if the industries that decides to move to the rural areas handle chemicals and hazardous materials.

Such businesses and industries can help the community living in the rural area at some point for it can increase job opportunities, innovation of livelihoods, but we should also consider the probable environmental effects this may cause.

I do not think such move from urban to rural areas is necessary to solve the issues of traffic congestion and housing in the major cities, rather the government and its engineers should have a viable urban planning in aiding such problems. The government can utilize other lots in the cities, create higher buildings to accommodate bigger population of people to solve housing problems.

Thus, I do not agree with such relocation of big companies, industries, and workers.

    Traffic congestion and housing shortages are major challenges for many cities today. Some propose moving large businesses, industries, and their workers to rural areas as a solution. However, I believe this approach is neither feasible nor effective. A more sustainable alternative would be to improve urban infrastructure and transportation systems rather than displacing economic hubs.

    To begin with, relocating businesses and industries would require extensive resources, planning, and coordination. According to the World Bank, relocating a firm demands careful management and significant resources, often disrupting productivity, profitability, and overall competitiveness, affecting both firms and workers. Additionally, uprooting employees from established urban communities could negatively impact their well-being and quality of life, making relocation an undesirable option for many. Given the financial and logistical burdens, large-scale relocation is unlikely to gain support from businesses or governments.

    Moreover, this strategy fails to address the root causes of traffic congestion and housing shortages. These issues stem from rapid urbanization, population growth, and inadequate infrastructure in cities. Moving some firms and workers would not resolve these fundamental problems but instead shift them elsewhere. Instead of relocating businesses, cities should focus on expanding public transportation and enforcing zoning regulations to create more efficient living spaces. Additionally, relocating businesses to rural areas could introduce new challenges, such as environmental degradation, social disruption, and economic disparities.

    In conclusion, addressing traffic congestion and housing shortages requires comprehensive urban planning and investment in infrastructure rather than relocating businesses and workers to rural areas. Thus, I think that developing smart cities with sustainable solutions can improve urban conditions while minimizing negative impacts on rural areas. By focusing on sustainable development and effective governance, cities can create long-term solutions that enhance livability while fostering balanced growth between urban and rural regions.