Band 5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay: Business Relocation and Coherence Issues
Sample Answer with Feedback

Some people believe that shifting huge enterprises, company and their employes from cities to villages is beneficial to control traffic jam and residential problem in big cities. I strongly disagree with this because it can cause financial crisis for many people. Although this essay will discuss both the views in the upcoming passage.

On the one hand, trasferring business to some extend reduce problems in urban area. However, residential apartments will be built in place of industries, it can secure a place of living for many people. For exemple, individuals shift in cities for better carrer opportunities face problem for finding a suitable place for living, so this can solve problems for them. Additionally, roads can be extended and rebuilt to solve severe traffic problems. To illustrate, government can construct highways for easy and safe commuting. Consequently making travelling more effective.

On the other hand, it has many disadvantages. Many families are completely depend on their agriculture land, so they will acquire agriculture lands and take their source of income. Furthermore, it will cause pollution which will harm the sorrundings, cause soil less fertile and destroy many living beings habitat. Secondly, rural area have many natural ecosystem, the pollution from these enterprises can vandalise these ecosystem and organisms living in them. As a result, this have hazardous and irreversible impact on our lentic ecosystem.

In conclusion, the dismerits are more sever then merits benefits. It can reduce problems like traffic and aparments, but can lead to detrimental impact on people and animals living in rural area.

    Traffic congestion and housing shortages are major challenges for many cities today. Some propose moving large businesses, industries, and their workers to rural areas as a solution. However, I believe this approach is neither feasible nor effective. A more sustainable alternative would be to improve urban infrastructure and transportation systems rather than displacing economic hubs.

    To begin with, relocating businesses and industries would require extensive resources, planning, and coordination. According to the World Bank, relocating a firm demands careful management and significant resources, often disrupting productivity, profitability, and overall competitiveness, affecting both firms and workers. Additionally, uprooting employees from established urban communities could negatively impact their well-being and quality of life, making relocation an undesirable option for many. Given the financial and logistical burdens, large-scale relocation is unlikely to gain support from businesses or governments.

    Moreover, this strategy fails to address the root causes of traffic congestion and housing shortages. These issues stem from rapid urbanization, population growth, and inadequate infrastructure in cities. Moving some firms and workers would not resolve these fundamental problems but instead shift them elsewhere. Instead of relocating businesses, cities should focus on expanding public transportation and enforcing zoning regulations to create more efficient living spaces. Additionally, relocating businesses to rural areas could introduce new challenges, such as environmental degradation, social disruption, and economic disparities.

    In conclusion, addressing traffic congestion and housing shortages requires comprehensive urban planning and investment in infrastructure rather than relocating businesses and workers to rural areas. Thus, I think that developing smart cities with sustainable solutions can improve urban conditions while minimizing negative impacts on rural areas. By focusing on sustainable development and effective governance, cities can create long-term solutions that enhance livability while fostering balanced growth between urban and rural regions.