IELTS Writing Task 2 Question
Agree/ Disagree (Opinion) · Urban Planning · 40 min
Relocating big businesses and industries and their workers from urban areas to rural areas could be a good solution for the issues of traffic congestion and housing in major cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Write at least 250 words.
Score Breakdown
IELTS Writing Band Scores (1–9)
Summary: The essay (309 words, meeting the 250-word minimum) addresses the topic by taking a position against relocating businesses to rural areas and instead advocates for improving urban infrastructure. However, it only partially covers the issue of housing (mentioned in the prompt) and focuses heavily on traffic congestion. Arguments are underdeveloped, and there are frequent language errors. The essay shows a basic structure but lacks clarity and cohesion. Overall, it demonstrates limited control of IELTS criteria, resulting in a band score of 5.0.
Now write your own — and see how your verdict holds up.
Submit your Urban Planning essay and receive AI scores across Task Response, Coherence, Lexical Resource, and Grammar — plus a Band 9 model answer for your exact question.
There is a burgeoning notion of migrating businesses and industries and their workers from urban areas to rural areas could be a reasonable solution for the problem of traffic jam and accomodating in metropolitian sites. I think it would be more sustainable and efficient , if we reconstructed the available urban road infrastructure and added some modern features to them rather than encroaching existing rural areas .
According to the proponents of relocating urban business and undustries , also their employees . If we move this contemporary entities to rural areas , it is likely that rural population is going to suffer the same phenomenon like it is occuring nowadays in highly populated cities . In the near future , they are likely suffer from air pollution , this is likely going to expand the scale of the issue , which is being faced by urban citizens . Furthermore , this scenario is considered irreversable once we relocate this current burden of urban traffic , then they can not just be restored their former location due to the matter of time and hefty amount of capital to relocate them .
Regarding the advocators of redesigning existing road infracstructure , this idea is truely vaible and can be handled by investing sufficiant amount of capital and resoureces for construction , this act might help communities for restraining the scale of current air pollution and may cause to cease the problem of traffic conjestion . Moreover, this may also bring new ways to tackle this pressing issue far more sustainably and efficiently in the future .
In conclusion, despite temporay benefits of relocating contemporary culprits of traffic jam to rural areas , it should be more reasonable to improve and redesign existing road infrastructure to more efficient and sustainable one. I belive this bring substantial future benefits to urban communities .
AI Feedback Report Details
Spelling · Grammar · Vocabulary · Criteria Analysis
Spelling Mistakes
14 errors| Misspelled Word | Corrected Word |
|---|---|
| accomodating | accommodating |
| metropolitian | metropolitan |
| undustries | industries |
| occuring | occurring |
| irreversable | irreversible |
| advocators | advocates |
| infracstructure | infrastructure |
| truely | truly |
| vaible | viable |
| sufficiant | sufficient |
| resoureces | resources |
| conjestion | congestion |
| temporay | temporary |
| belive | believe |
Grammatical Mistakes
9 errors| Mistake | Correction | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| notion of migrating businesses and industries and their workers from urban areas to rural areas could be | notion that migrating businesses and industries and their workers from urban areas to rural areas could be | Missing relative pronoun 'that' to connect the clause |
| also their employees | along with their employees | Fragment; 'also their employees' is not a complete clause; use 'along with' to integrate |
| this contemporary entities | these contemporary entities | Plural noun 'entities' requires plural determiner 'these' |
| the same phenomenon like it is occuring nowadays | the same phenomenon that is occurring nowadays | Incorrect use of 'like' as a conjunction; use 'that' for a defining relative clause |
| they are likely suffer | they are likely to suffer | Missing 'to' after 'likely' for infinitive |
| can not just be restored their former location | cannot simply be restored to their former location | Missing preposition 'to' and incorrect pronoun 'their' (refers to burden, not plural); restructured for clarity |
| this might help communities for restraining | this might help communities in restraining | Incorrect preposition; 'help in' or 'help to' is standard |
| may cause to cease | may cause the cessation of | Incomplete verb pattern; 'cause' requires an object and infinitive or 'cause the cessation of' |
| belive this bring | believe this brings | Subject-verb agreement: 'this' is singular, requires 'brings' |
Vocabulary Improvements
5 suggestions| Original Word/Phrase | Improved Word/Phrase | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| traffic jam | traffic congestion | Informal; 'congestion' is more formal and suitable for academic writing |
| accommodating | accommodation | Wrong word form; 'accommodation' (noun) is needed instead of verb 'accommodating' |
| hefty amount of capital | substantial amount of capital | 'Hefty' is informal; 'substantial' is more appropriate in formal context |
| culprits | causes | Metaphorical and informal; 'causes' or 'sources' is more precise and academic |
| advocators | advocates | Non-standard word; 'advocates' is the correct term |
Ready to practise? Get instant AI feedback on your verdict.
Submit your Urban Planning essay and receive AI scores across all four IELTS criteria — with specific feedback on whether your solutions are specific, realistic, and matched to your problems.
Detailed Criteria Feedback
AI-powered analysis for each scoring criterion