IELTS Writing Task 2 Question
Agree/ Disagree (Opinion) · Urban Planning · 40 min
Relocating big businesses and industries and their workers from urban areas to rural areas could be a good solution for the issues of traffic congestion and housing in major cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Write at least 250 words.
Score Breakdown
IELTS Writing Band Scores (1–9)
Summary: The essay meets the word count requirement (350 words vs. 250 minimum) but only partially addresses the prompt. It agrees with relocating people to rural areas, focusing on environmental and health benefits rather than directly discussing how relocating businesses and industries alleviates traffic congestion and housing issues. This affects task response. Cohesion is basic, but lexical and grammatical errors are frequent, limiting clarity and precision.
Now write your own — and see how your verdict holds up.
Submit your Urban Planning essay and receive AI scores across Task Response, Coherence, Lexical Resource, and Grammar — plus a Band 9 model answer for your exact question.
It is irrefutable that overwhelming population in urban areas are responsible for traffic congestion and housing problems in bigger cities. Therefore, to address this issue people should be relocated from urban areas to village areas. I strongly agree with this view, because this initiative can improve the environment of cities and longer the life expectancy of individuals .
To begin with, one prime advantage of relocating people from urban areas to countryside is to reduce in environmental pollution. This is because when many people live in a small area, they leave more trash and use more transportation, which use fossil fuels. To illustrate, according to research, as urban population are rising rapidly , the emission of carbon dioxide is increasing. As a result, the earth temperature has already increased and ice caps of polar regions have started melting for the last few years. If the sea levels increased above 2 meters than the previous one , many people in costal regions would have lost their habitats and might suffer from foods, shelters ,and jobs.
In addition, another considerable benefit of replacing people from towns to village is that it increases the life span of many individuals, as they can take fresh foods, breath pure air and play outdoor sports in open areas. For instance, if some people shift from cities to rural areas, they can enjoy a healthy lifestyle because of living in less polluted areas. When they go for a morning walk or eat fresh vegetables , the blood circulation of their bodies will be improved and strong their immune systems after taking pollutants free oxygen from nature. Therefore , they feel more energised and refreshed, which also reduces further environmental problems, because they will not impact on releasing harmful gases.
In conclusion , relocating from bigger cities to countryside not only reduces gobal warming but also increases life expectancy of general people by inspiring them to take natural foods and protect nature. Therefore, I support this phenomenon for ensuring the holistic development of environment as well as personal well-being by enhancing to live in a pollution free environment.
AI Feedback Report Details
Spelling · Grammar · Vocabulary · Criteria Analysis
Spelling Mistakes
3 errors| Misspelled Word | Corrected Word |
|---|---|
| gobal | global |
| costal | coastal |
| breath | breathe |
Grammatical Mistakes
14 errors| Mistake | Correction | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| overwhelming population in urban areas are | overpopulation in urban areas is | Subject-verb agreement: 'population' is singular, so 'is' should be used. 'Overpopulation' is more precise. |
| to reduce in environmental pollution | to reduce environmental pollution | Preposition misuse: 'in' is unnecessary after 'reduce'. |
| which use fossil fuels | which uses fossil fuels | Subject-verb agreement: 'transportation' is singular, so 'uses' is required. |
| as urban population are rising rapidly | as the urban population is rising rapidly | Subject-verb agreement: 'population' is singular, so 'is' should be used. The definite article 'the' is needed. |
| the earth temperature | Earth's temperature | Possessive form needed: 'Earth' should be in possessive case for temperature. |
| for the last few years | over the last few years | Preposition use: 'over' is more appropriate with time periods. |
| If the sea levels increased above 2 meters than the previous one | If sea levels rise by more than 2 meters above previous levels | Conditional and comparison error: 'rise' is the correct verb form for future possibility, and 'than' should be 'above' or 'compared to'. |
| would have lost their habitats | would lose their habitats | Verb tense in conditional: 'would lose' is correct for future hypothetical situations. |
| suffer from foods, shelters ,and jobs | suffer from shortages of food, shelter, and employment | Noun form and article: 'food' and 'shelter' are uncountable, and 'employment' is more formal than 'jobs'. |
| strong their immune systems | strengthen their immune systems | Verb form: 'strong' is an adjective; the verb 'strengthen' is needed. |
| pollutants free oxygen | pollutant-free oxygen | Hyphenation: Compound adjectives should be hyphenated when preceding a noun. |
| they will not impact on releasing harmful gases | they will not contribute to the release of harmful gases | Collocation and grammar: 'impact on' is incorrect; 'contribute to' is the appropriate phrase. |
| increases life expectancy of general people | increases the life expectancy of the general population | Article and noun phrase: 'the' is needed before 'life expectancy', and 'general population' is more precise than 'general people'. |
| by enhancing to live in a pollution free environment | by promoting living in a pollution-free environment | Verb pattern and hyphenation: 'enhancing to live' is grammatically incorrect; 'promoting living' is better, and 'pollution-free' should be hyphenated. |
Vocabulary Improvements
21 suggestions| Original Word/Phrase | Improved Word/Phrase | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| overwhelming population | overpopulation | More precise term for rapid population growth in academic writing. |
| bigger cities | major cities | 'Major cities' is more formal and academic than 'bigger cities'. |
| village areas | rural areas | 'Rural areas' is the standard term for countryside regions. |
| longer the life expectancy | increase the life expectancy | 'Longer' is an adjective; the verb 'increase' is needed for action. |
| prime advantage | primary advantage | 'Primary' is more commonly used in academic writing than 'prime'. |
| leave more trash | generate more waste | 'Generate waste' is more formal and precise than 'leave trash'. |
| use more transportation | rely more on transportation | 'Rely on' is a better collocation for dependence on transport. |
| ice caps of polar regions | polar ice caps | 'Polar ice caps' is a standard and concise term. |
| foods, shelters, and jobs | food, shelter, and employment | 'Food' and 'shelter' are uncountable nouns, and 'employment' is more formal than 'jobs'. |
| replacing people | relocating people | 'Relocating' is more accurate than 'replacing' in the context of moving people. |
| take fresh foods | consume fresh food | 'Consume' is more academic and precise than 'take' for eating. |
| breath pure air | breathe pure air | 'Breathe' is the verb form, while 'breath' is a noun. |
| shift from cities | move from cities | 'Move' is a standard verb for relocation; 'shift' is less formal in this context. |
| pollutants free oxygen | pollutant-free oxygen | Compound adjective should be hyphenated for clarity. |
| impact on releasing harmful gases | contribute to the emission of harmful gases | 'Contribute to the emission' is a more precise and academic collocation. |
| gobal warming | global warming | Correct term for the increase in Earth's average temperature. |
| general people | the general public | 'The general public' is a common and formal phrase. |
| take natural foods | consume natural foods | 'Consume' is more academic than 'take' for eating food. |
| this phenomenon | this initiative | 'Initiative' is more specific to the proposed action than 'phenomenon'. |
| holistic development of environment | holistic development of the environment | The definite article 'the' is needed before 'environment'. |
| by enhancing to live | by fostering a pollution-free lifestyle | 'Fostering a lifestyle' is clearer and more grammatical than 'enhancing to live'. |
Ready to practise? Get instant AI feedback on your verdict.
Submit your Urban Planning essay and receive AI scores across all four IELTS criteria — with specific feedback on whether your solutions are specific, realistic, and matched to your problems.
Detailed Criteria Feedback
AI-powered analysis for each scoring criterion