Band 8 IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay on Relocating Businesses: Cohesion & Structure Issues
Sample Answer with Feedback

It is often argued that transferring large corporations and their employees from overcrowded cities to rural regions would effectively alleviate urban problems such as traffic congestion and housing shortages. While this proposal has some merit, I largely disagree that it represents a comprehensive or practical solution. Although it could offer partial relief, significant logistical, economic, and social challenges make it an incomplete answer to deep-rooted urban issues.
On the positive side, decentralisation could undoubtedly ease pressure on major cities. Metropolitan areas like London, New York, or Dhaka suffer from chronic traffic gridlock and sky-high property prices largely because they concentrate economic activity. Moving headquarters, factories, and skilled workers to rural zones would reduce daily commuting volumes, lower demand for urban housing, and potentially decrease pollution levels. Furthermore, rural economies would benefit from job creation, infrastructure investment, and population growth, helping to bridge the urban-rural development gap. Countries such as China have successfully implemented similar policies by developing satellite cities and industrial parks in less populated provinces, demonstrating measurable improvements in urban livability.
However, the drawbacks of such large-scale relocation are substantial and often underestimated. Firstly, rural areas frequently lack the advanced infrastructure — reliable high-speed internet, modern transportation networks, quality schools, and healthcare facilities — that businesses and their employees require. Forcing companies to relocate could severely disrupt operations, reduce productivity, and even lead to business failures. Employees, particularly younger professionals and families, may resist moving due to limited social and cultural amenities, resulting in talent shortages or high turnover. Moreover, many industries rely on face-to-face collaboration, proximity to clients, suppliers, and international airports, which rural locations cannot easily provide. The enormous cost of building new facilities and relocating staff would likely be passed on to consumers or taxpayers, creating economic inefficiencies.
Instead of wholesale relocation, governments should prioritise smarter urban solutions. Investing in efficient public transport systems, promoting remote and hybrid working models (accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic), and encouraging vertical urban development with affordable housing can address congestion and housing crises more effectively. Urban planning policies that incentivise businesses to expand in secondary cities rather than forcing complete relocation would offer a more balanced approach.
In conclusion, while relocating big businesses and workers to rural areas may provide some relief to overburdened cities, it is not a highly effective or feasible primary solution due to practical barriers and potential new problems it would create. A combination of technological innovation, improved infrastructure, and strategic urban planning offers far more sustainable pathways to resolving traffic and housing challenges.