Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Income Limits Essay: Clarity & Coherence Issues
Sample Answer with Feedback

The idea of having large sums of money seems tempting, conversely, other people see accumulating money should be observed by governments. both views has their advantages and disadvantages. I believe that government should have a say but not total control.

Being able to buy anything a man wants sounds like the absolute freedom dream most people aspire to achieve oneday, but that very dream is the one that made the ultra powerful one percenters be like what they are today, made a very small group of people able to determine the fate of the rest, and set the rules of the game so that the situation stays like this.

on the other hand, when the government interference has absolute power, it gradually converts to a regime that resembles (or is) a dictatorship, in which everyone is hurt equally, except for the governing people, in that way, we also got another type of ultra powerful one percenters.

What I believe the correct set of regulations is that the government should be able to minimize the danger of inherent human greed, with laws that protect the innovation of humans so creativity is not taxed, but in the same way no one CEO is to become more powerful than the governing body itself, and the helpless people are protected from being eternal cog in an evil machine set to make the rich people even richer without advancing the wheel of human progress.

to summarize, both points of views may be beneficial, and both could be dangerous if not regulated, so my own view is something in between, observing eye" title="Correction: an observing eye">a bit of observing eye from the government with well-provided freedom so the innovators don't feel suffocated and imigrate to a more forgiving environment in another country.

It is often debated whether governments should have the power to control the salaries of the highest earners in society. Some people claim that allowing individuals to earn as much as they want benefits the country, while others, including me, argue that a maximum wage should be implemented. In this essay, I will examine both perspectives and present my own view.

On the one hand, some people support the idea of allowing individuals to earn exceptionally high incomes, believing that this fosters competition and innovation. Those with exceptional skills, knowledge, and experience can command high salaries from their employers, attracting more talent and investment to the country. For example, renowned professionals such as Dr. Anthony Fauci, Elon Musk, and Tim Berners-Lee have chosen to work in the United States due to the lucrative pay packages offered. Furthermore, high-income earners contribute significantly to the public sector through taxes, benefiting society as a whole.

On the other hand, opponents argue that excessive salaries create social problems and deepen inequality. Some of the world's wealthiest individuals have been linked to tax evasion, money laundering, and human rights violations. Moreover, income disparity widens the gap between the rich and the poor, fueling resentment and social unrest. A study by the World Bank found that countries with greater income inequality tend to experience higher rates of crime, conflict, and instability. I believe that governments should ensure that all citizens have an adequate standard of living and equal opportunities to succeed. Establishing fair income policies would promote a more democratic and prosperous society.

In conclusion, I believe that allowing individuals to earn excessively high incomes is detrimental to the country, and governments should introduce a maximum wage policy as soon as possible. By regulating salaries, societies can achieve greater economic balance and prevent disparities that hinder social progress.