Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 University Subjects Choice and Feedback on Depth
Sample Answer with Feedback

The debate on whether university students should have the freedom to choose subjects or limit their studies to subjects that are relevant to their future careers is critical at a time when professional efficiency is declining and mental health concerns cases keep increasing. While both sides of the argument seem to have valid justifications, I believe that university curriculums should integrate both mandatory courses that are relevant to the field of study, and also give students the freedom to choose subjects that align with their personal interests and value systems.

Research shows that student acamic experience that is entirely curated by the university contributes to mental health challenges and produces professional who are not fulfilled with their careers. To begin with, research shows that, student interest is a critical factor in curricular success. Every student has unique, personal values and interests that make them feel fulfiled once endulged. Giving students the option to choose subjects that align with their personal values and interests ensures that students find satisfaction in their time being in university, but also, fulfilment in their professional careers.

On the other hand, every field of study has foundational principles that must be learnt by students who will be experts in that field. For example, mathermatics is a critical subject for any engineering field. Therefore, making mathematics mandatory ensures that enginineering professional gain the critical thinking abilities that will enable them to thrive in the field. This is why integrated both sides of the argument is crucial.

      Education is a personal journey, and having autonomy in selecting subjects can lead to deeper learning experiences. The question of whether university students should have the freedom to select their own subjects or whether they should be restricted to subjects that are relevant for the future, such as those in science and technology, is a matter of debate. I believe that students should be free to choose their own subjects. In this essay, I will examine both these perspectives and discuss my own view.

      On the one hand, allowing students to choose their own subjects can foster a sense of ownership over their learning journey. When learners have control over the content they engage with in class, it can lead to increased motivation and engagement. Additionally, they can choose classes based on individual interest which allows for more personalized instruction as each student has unique passions and areas of expertise they want to explore further.

      On the other hand, some argue that students should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. This is because these fields are expected to grow in the future and will provide students with better job prospects. However, I think that, while it is important for students to have some guidance when choosing their subjects, they should ultimately be free to choose what they want to study. This is because students who are passionate about what they are learning are more likely to succeed in their studies and find fulfilling careers later on.

      In conclusion, while there are valid arguments on both sides of the debate, I believe that students should have the freedom to choose their own subjects. This is because it allows them to explore their interests and passions, which can lead to increased motivation and engagement in their studies.