Band 6 IELTS Writing Task 2 City Funding Essay: Argument Development Issues
Sample Answer with Feedback

Some people argue that governments should spend public money only on essential services such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure. Others believe that funding arts, culture, and entertainment is equally important for improving the quality of life in cities. This essay will discuss both views before presenting my own opinion.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that essential services should be the top priority for governments. Healthcare systems, for example, are vital for saving lives and ensuring a healthy population. Similarly, education plays a crucial role in developing skilled individuals who contribute to economic growth. Infrastructure, including roads and public transportation, is also necessary for daily life and business activities. Without sufficient funding in these areas, a city cannot function properly, and citizens may suffer from poor living conditions.
On the other hand, investing in arts and entertainment also brings significant benefits. Cultural activities such as museums, theatres, and festivals enhance people’s well-being and provide opportunities for relaxation and creativity. Moreover, these sectors can attract tourists, which boosts the local economy and creates jobs. A city without cultural life may become dull and less appealing to both residents and visitors.
In my opinion, while essential services must be prioritized, governments should not neglect arts and culture. A balanced approach is the best solution, where basic needs are fully met, and some funding is allocated to cultural development.
In conclusion, although essential services are fundamental, investment in arts and entertainment is also important for creating vibrant and livable cities.

The way city governments allocate public funds has a profound impact on the quality of urban life. While some argue that municipal budgets should focus exclusively on essential services such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure, others believe that arts, culture, and entertainment are equally vital for creating vibrant and inclusive cities. This essay will explore both perspectives before presenting my view that cultural investment is indispensable for sustainable urban development.

On one hand, prioritizing essential services is seen as a practical and ethical obligation. In densely populated cities, access to reliable healthcare, quality education, and efficient infrastructure is critical for public safety and economic productivity. Hospitals, schools, and transport systems form the backbone of urban functionality. Supporters of this view argue that cultural initiatives, while enriching, are secondary luxuries that can be supported through private sponsorship or ticket revenue. Especially in cities facing budget constraints or social inequality, allocating funds to basic services is often considered non-negotiable.

However, advocates for cultural spending emphasize its transformative power in urban settings. Public investment in museums, theaters, parks, and festivals not only enhances the city’s identity but also fosters emotional well-being, creativity, and social cohesion. Cultural spaces provide platforms for dialogue, inclusion, and civic pride — particularly in diverse and marginalized communities. Moreover, arts and entertainment stimulate local economies through tourism, job creation, and small business growth. A city that neglects its cultural life may become efficient but emotionally disconnected, lacking inspiration and shared meaning.

In conclusion, while essential services must remain a priority, I firmly believe that arts and culture are integral to a thriving urban environment. A well-balanced city budget should reflect both practical needs and the human desire for connection, creativity, and joy. Investing in cultural life is not a luxury — it is a strategic choice that enriches cities and strengthens their social fabric.